Scholarly record
BETWEEN INTUITION AND SCIENCE: SOME EXAMPLES OF ELECTRONIC MUSIC BY IANNIS XENAKIS
Abstract
Every musical style can be characterized by means of probabilistic restrictions imposed upon structures as well as mutual relations between those structures and the mental representation of musical surfaces formed on their basis by listeners. In music, narratives generally result from a culturally embedded musical language that has been established over the course of centuries. There seem to be two factors that contributed to specific way that Xenakis understood music – the free play of the imagination directly related to intuition and the conviction that the creative process has a scientistic aspect. An approach to music like that seems to entail that: 1. musical time is a series of moments, each of which has its own value, irrespective of what follows a given moment or what consequences it allows to predict; and 2. musical structure cannot be a product of some accepted convention or tradition, but it must emerge from within the structure of the sound material itself and from the way the sound material is used in a particular musical work. But in electronic music has been introduced an entirely new vocabulary of sounds. Organization of electronic music, extending beyond the well-known structures of a traditional musical language, induces listener's cognitive problem [1]. The purpose of the investigation is to recognize how adequate the adopted Xenakis' strategy can be with respect to the artist's initial idea concerning the organization of the macro-form of the electronic work and of its musical surface perceived by listeners, and also how the nature of electronic music provides a different form of communication between the composer and the listener. The main method is a comparison of the philosophical and methodological foundations of Xenakis' selected electronic works to the automated analysis of their realizations. Results of these comparisons allowed to establish that the creation phases referred to by the composer's point to two principally distinct kinds of the creative process. Detailed studies of musical works and analyses of the composer's opinions concerning the same works show the general conclusion – the intellectual and extra-intellectual factors complement one another in various proportions.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
ReferencesPending
Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.




